For research use only. We do not sell to patients.
Ionizable lipids / LUMI6
LUMI6 chemical structure
Product imageResearch use only
CAT. NO. DC60793Featured

LUMI6

Pack size & price

USD
TotalUS$690
We match the best price and quality on market.
Ships from ShanghaiIce-pack transportPure lipid recommended
Product overview

Description & Application

LUMI6 (LUMI-6) is a brominated ionizable lipid identified by the LUMI-lab platform. The 2026 Cell study evaluates cellular mRNA delivery, intratracheal lung reporter editing and repeat-dose tolerability. The reported Ai9 experiment achieved 20.3% reporter-positive lung epithelial cells.

Open full Formulation & Performance →

Literature evidence · DC60793

Formulation & Performance

Updated against the author-hosted 2026 Cell article, including its STAR Methods and supplementary figures. The final article uses a 30:39:30:1 DOTAP-containing pulmonary formulation; this replaces the earlier preprint formulation in this evidence module.

LUMI6, LUMI-6 and DC60793 refer to the same catalog lipid here. LUMI-6D and LUMI-6Cl are separate comparator compounds. The 20.3% result is reporter activation in an Ai9 model, not a disease-correction percentage.

Formulation components and molecular-weight conversion

ComponentDC Chemicals productMolecular weightMolar ratioMass at 1 µmol total lipid (mg)
LUMI6DC60793822.07300.246621
DOTAPNot uniquely mappedNot established39Not calculable from disclosed data
CholesterolDCD-041386.65300.115995
DMG-PEG2000DC40169250710.025070

Final article STAR Methods: ionizable lipid / DOTAP / cholesterol / DMG-PEG2000 = 30:39:30:1 mol% for intratracheal experiments unless otherwise stated. DMG-PEG2000 MW is 2507. DOTAP counterion/catalog identity is not sufficiently specified for an exact mass assignment and remains blank. Neither N/P nor total lipid:RNA mass ratio is assigned.

Component mass calculator

Not all inputs are assigned to a single verified study formulation; unassigned fields are blank. Enter your own values to calculate a research scenario. Molecular weights and ratios are editable. Results are calculated, not measured study data. No N/P or RNA dose is inferred.

ComponentMWMolar ratioMass (mg)Mass %
LUMI6——
DOTAP——
Cholesterol——
DMG-PEG2000——

Matched DOPE-containing formulation comparison

ComponentDC Chemicals productMolecular weightMolar ratioMass at 1 µmol total lipid (mg)
LUMI6DC60793822.07350.287724
DOPEDC33634744.03160.119045
CholesterolDCD-041386.6546.50.179792
DMG-PEG2000DC4016925072.50.062675

Final STAR Methods and supplementary formulation comparison: 35:16:46.5:2.5 mol%. This is separated from the automated-screen paragraph, which uses a phosphoethanolamine-based C14-PEG description.

Component mass calculator

Prefilled proportions follow the source specified above. Molecular weights and ratios are editable. Results are calculated, not measured study data. No N/P or RNA dose is inferred.

ComponentMWMolar ratioMass (mg)Mass %
LUMI6——
DOPE——
Cholesterol——
DMG-PEG2000——

DSPC-containing comparison / intramuscular safety formulation

ComponentDC Chemicals productMolecular weightMolar ratioMass at 1 µmol total lipid (mg)
LUMI6DC60793822.07500.411035
DSPCDC57005790.15100.079015
CholesterolDCD-041386.6538.50.148860
DMG-PEG2000DC4016925071.50.037605

Final STAR Methods: DSPC-containing formulation 50:10:38.5:1.5. The intramuscular tolerability experiment excludes DOTAP. Route-specific safety findings are not transferred to the DOTAP formulation.

Component mass calculator

Prefilled proportions follow the source specified above. Molecular weights and ratios are editable. Results are calculated, not measured study data. No N/P or RNA dose is inferred.

ComponentMWMolar ratioMass (mg)Mass %
LUMI6——
DSPC——
Cholesterol——
DMG-PEG2000——

Final-publication formulation and comparison context

Study / parameterReported evidenceSource / interpretation
VersionCell 2026 article, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2026.01.012; author-hosted article-in-press PDF includes supplementary figuresPublished record: Cell 189, 1620–1635.e25
Pulmonary candidate LNPLUMI6 / DOTAP / cholesterol / DMG-PEG2000 = 30:39:30:1STAR Methods; supersedes the old preprint ratio in this module
Comparator contextSM-102 and MC3 reference LNPs use DSPC 50:10:38.5:1.5 unless otherwise statedSome comparisons change helper lipid and ratio as well as the ionizable lipid
Unresolved inputsNo N/P or total lipid:RNA mass ratio assigned; DOTAP salt MW not assignedRNA:RNA ratios below are cargo ratios only
Size/PDIMain Fig. 5c–d reports DLS measurements for the six candidatesExact values are not inferred from graph heights; no batch release specification

Cellular expression and endosomal escape

Study / parameterReported evidenceSource / interpretation
Matched lipid comparisonLUMI6 versus LUMI-6D in HBE cells; 18 h; 1.8-fold higher luciferase expression reportedMain Results and Fig. S2b; matched formulation conditions
Cell viabilityCCK-8 assays did not show a significant difference between brominated and debrominated candidatesFig. S2c; does not establish absence of toxicity at all concentrations
Intracellular RNAAt 2–6 h both formulations showed endosomal localization; at 18 h LUMI6 showed more cytoplasmic RNA signalFig. S2d–e; fluorescence-based mechanistic evidence
Formulation sensitivitySupplementary comparison examines DOPE, DSPC and DOTAP helper systemsFig. S4f–g; helper system influences measured potency

Pulmonary expression and Ai9 reporter editing

Study / parameterReported evidenceSource / interpretation
Luciferase screenIntratracheal Fluc mRNA 0.25 mg/kg; readout at 6 h; n = 3STAR Methods and Fig. 5; use final-publication dose context
Ai9 scheduleIntratracheal dosing on days 0, 3 and 6; analysis day 9Main Fig. 6a and STAR Methods
Cargo doseCas9 mRNA 1 mg/kg per administration; Cas9 mRNA:sgRNA 4:1 by massDose is explicitly stated on the Cas9 mRNA basis
Epithelial cellsEpCAM-positive population: 20.3% tdTomato-positive with LUMI6 versus 15.4% with SM-102Fig. 6c; n = 3 independent animals, two samples per mouse
Endothelial cellsCD31-positive population: 1.8% versus 2.7% with SM-102Fig. 6c; separate cell population
Airway localizationReporter fluorescence colocalized with club and ciliated cell markersFig. 6d; no cell-type percentage is assigned from microscopy

The Fig. 6b caption describes a 6-hour Fluc experiment within the Ai9 editing figure. That panel is not used here to derive an editing percentage or resolve the dosing schedule; Fig. 6a/c and STAR Methods support the reporter record.

Additional base-editing reporter evidence

Study / parameterReported evidenceSource / interpretation
ModelLumA luciferase reporter mice with an inactivating reporter mutationFig. S5; reporter restoration is distinct from the Ai9 deletion assay
Study scheduleIntratracheal 0.75 mg/kg per dose on days 0 and 7; analysis day 11Fig. S5b; ABE mRNA:guide RNA 1:1 mass ratio in STAR Methods
ResultHigher lung luminescence and sequencing-detected base conversion with LUMI6 than SM-102Fig. S5c–f; no exact percentage is inferred from bars
InterpretationFunctional reporter restoration with sequencing supportNot correction of a patient disease allele or clinical efficacy

Repeat-dose tolerability and immune response

Study / parameterReported evidenceSource / interpretation
Intratracheal studyFive 0.5 mg/kg mRNA-LNP administrations on days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28; 6/24 h after the final dose assessedFig. S6a; DSPC and DOTAP LUMI6 groups are distinct
Measured endpointsCytokine/chemokine panels, major-organ histology, hemolysis and complement sC5b-9Fig. S6; cytokine panels n = 3, hemolysis/complement n = 5
Inflammatory interpretationThe authors report tolerability comparable to SM-102; plots show treatment-related cytokine/complement signalsComparable to a benchmark does not mean no immune activation
Intramuscular studyFive weekly 0.5 mg/kg doses; DOTAP excluded; cytokines and histology assessedFig. S7; 6/24 h sampling and n = 3
ScopeNo significant histological abnormalities reported under tested conditionsRoute-, formulation- and dose-specific rodent evidence; no human safety conclusion

Original study figures

Main Figs. 5–6: lung expression, reporter flow cytometry and airway microscopy — Original source figures.

Supplementary Figs. S2, S5–S7: cellular mechanism, base-editing reporter and repeat-dose safety — Original source figures.

References and source locations

  1. Xu Y, Cui H, Pang K et al. LUMI-lab: A foundation model-driven autonomous platform enabling discovery of ionizable lipid designs for mRNA delivery. Cell 189, 1620–1635.e25 (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2026.01.012.
  2. Author publication page: final-publication PDF, STAR Methods and supplementary figures.
CAS No.Not available
Chemical NameLUMI6
SynonymsLUMI-6; LUMI 6; LUMI6
SMILESCCCCCCCCC(CCCCCC)C(=O)OCCCCCC(C(=O)NC12CC3CC(CC(C3)C1)C2)N(CCN1CCNCC1)C(=O)CCCCCBr
FormulaC45H81BrN4O4
Molecular weight822.07
Purity / availability>95% by ELSD-HPLC
StorageUnopened pure lipid: −20 °C, up to 1 year. Follow batch expiry / retest information.
Shipping conditionShips from Shanghai. Pure lipid is stable during ice-pack transport.
Laboratory planning

Solution Calculators

The product molecular weight is prefilled when available and remains editable. Confirm solvent compatibility and solubility before preparation.

Mass = concentration × volume × molecular weight
Enter any three values to calculate the fourth.
C₁V₁ = C₂V₂
Enter any three values to calculate the fourth.
Preparing stock solutions

Quick preparation table

Solvent volumes update from the molecular weight above.

Mass1 mM5 mM10 mM
10 mg12.1644 mL2.4329 mL1.2164 mL
25 mg30.4110 mL6.0822 mL3.0411 mL
50 mg60.8221 mL12.1644 mL6.0822 mL
100 mg121.6441 mL24.3288 mL12.1644 mL
250 mg304.1104 mL60.8221 mL30.4110 mL

Need a different pack size or technical document?

Contact our team with the catalog number and requested quantity.

Contact us
Handling guidance

Shipping, storage and sampling

How is the lipid shipped, and how should I store it?
We ship the pure lipid with ice packs. On receipt, store the unopened product at −20 °C for up to 1 year, protected from light and moisture. Allow the sealed vial to reach room temperature before opening to avoid condensation. Keep the vial tightly closed after use. Follow the expiry or retest date on the supplied batch documentation.
Pure lipid or solution — which should I choose?
Our standard supply format is the pure lipid, without ethanol. Prepare an ethanol stock solution when needed for your formulation. Gentle warming and brief sonication may help dissolution. Confirm complete dissolution before use. If you require a prepared solution, contact us with the solvent and target concentration. The 1-year storage guidance applies to the unopened pure lipid; solution storage depends on the solvent and preparation conditions.
How should I measure a small amount of oily or viscous lipid?
Ionizable lipids may be oily liquids or viscous semisolids, so material can be lost during repeated weighing or transfer. For a small pack, dissolve the entire quantity and aliquot it volumetrically. For example, dissolve 25 mg lipid and adjust to a final solution volume of 1 mL to prepare a 25 mg/mL stock; 100 µL then contains 2.5 mg. Use an accurate pipette and confirm solvent compatibility and complete dissolution. For larger quantities, direct weighing with an analytical balance may be more practical.
Can you support formulation optimization and scale-up?
Yes. Share the RNA cargo, target tissue, administration route, formulation method and assay plan. Our team can discuss starting molar ratios, N/P ratio and scale-up requirements for research workflows.