DC ChemicalsChemicals for Life Science
sales@dcchemicals.com

DCL0011 · Updated 24 October 2026

PA97MD101
Formulation & Performance

This edition organizes the previously reviewed, source-linked product record. It is not a new independent review of every paper or supporting file. Reported and calculated values retain their original labels.

View original study figures ↓

Literature LNP formulation

Components / mol%PA97MD101 / DSPC / Cholesterol / PEG-DMG (PEG2000) = 50 / 10 / 38.5 / 1.5 (total 100%)
N/P ratioNot reported
PreparationMicrofluidic mixing; ethanol 3 mL/min + aqueous phase 9 mL/min; total flow 12 mL/min
Aqueous phase10 mM sodium citrate, pH 4.5
Post-processingAt least three 30 kDa centrifugal-filter wash cycles, then 0.22 μm filtration; adjusted to 1 mg/mL total lipid; formulated LNPs stored at 4°C until use
Apparent LNP pKa6.85 (TNS fluorescence titration)
mRNA encapsulation91.19 ± 0.58% SD; n = 3 independent samples (RiboGreen assay)
Mass ratio40:1 lipid:mRNA is specified for the in vitro screen; it is not an N/P ratio and is not assigned here to the in vivo experiments

Main Methods pp. 10-11; Supplementary Fig. 25, p. 26. Exact particle size and PDI are not transcribed from plotted figures.

Values shown are literature-reported results for the cited formulation and study conditions. They do not guarantee performance of the supplied product in other formulations or experiments.

Reference [1]: Zhang Z, Ren Y, Kong D, et al. Interpretable AI-guided discovery of degradable ionizable lipids with enhanced hepatic mRNA delivery in vivo. Nature Communications (2026), Article in Press. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78635-1. Exact source locations are given above.

Component molecular weights and calculated amounts

Main Methods pp. 10–11; catalog MW convention for PEG-DMG = 2507.

ComponentMolecular weightMolar partsNormalized mol%Amount (µmol)Weight (mg)
PA97MD10150.00071.560462.0042
DSPC10.00014.312111.3087
Cholesterol38.50055.101521.3050
PEG-DMG (PEG2000)1.5002.14685.3821

Calculated total: 100.0000 mg lipid.

Calculated catalog planning quantities; RNA, solvent and process loss are excluded. DMG-PEG2000 uses 2507. Component mass = total lipid mass × molar parts × molecular weight / sum(parts × molecular weight). This conversion does not infer N/P.

Hepatic luciferase expression

CargoFluc mRNA
RouteIntravenous, tail vein
Dose0.1 mg/kg mRNA, single injection
ModelC57BL/6 mice, 6-8 weeks; n=3/group
Readout time6 h

Hepatic Fluc expression: Approximately 4-fold higher than SM-102 (author-reported approximation).

Main Results p.6 and Discussion p.8; Fig.5c-e; Methods p.10. Comparator: SM-102, matched cargo/dose/route/time.

Cropped from Zhang et al., Fig. 5c-d; labels and axes retained. CC BY 4.0.

Values shown are literature-reported results for the cited formulation and study conditions. They do not guarantee performance of the supplied product in other formulations or experiments.

Reference [1]: Zhang Z, Ren Y, Kong D, et al. Interpretable AI-guided discovery of degradable ionizable lipids with enhanced hepatic mRNA delivery in vivo. Nature Communications (2026), Article in Press. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78635-1. Exact source locations are given above.

Cre-dependent liver recombination

CargoCre mRNA
RouteIntravenous, tail vein
Dose0.25 mg/kg mRNA, single injection
ModelmTmG reporter mice; n=3/group
Readout timeDay 3

Liver-level Cre-dependent functional output: Approximately 6.75-fold higher liver-level Cre-dependent recombination reported in Discussion; fluorescence and LoxP qPCR support functional delivery.

Main Discussion p.8; Fig.5g-j; Methods pp.11-12; SI Figs.34-42. Comparator: SM-102.

Cell-population-resolved output: Greater EGFP activation in CD31-/CD45- hepatocyte-enriched cells; not hepatocyte-exclusive or proof of receptor-specific targeting.

Main Results p.6; Fig.5i-j; SI Fig.41 (p.41). Comparator: SM-102.

Cropped from Zhang et al., Fig. 5j. EGFP activation measures functional delivery and recombination, not nanoparticle uptake alone. CC BY 4.0.

Values shown are literature-reported results for the cited formulation and study conditions. They do not guarantee performance of the supplied product in other formulations or experiments.

Reference [1]: Zhang Z, Ren Y, Kong D, et al. Interpretable AI-guided discovery of degradable ionizable lipids with enhanced hepatic mRNA delivery in vivo. Nature Communications (2026), Article in Press. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78635-1. Exact source locations are given above.

Cas9/sgTtr delivery and TTR suppression

CargoCas9 mRNA + sgTtr, 5:1 mass ratio
RouteIntravenous, tail vein
DosePer injection: Cas9 mRNA 0.25 mg/kg plus sgRNA 0.05 mg/kg; two consecutive daily injections. sgRNA dose and 0.30 mg/kg total RNA per injection are calculated from 5:1.
ModelC57BL/6 mice; n=3/group
Readout timeDay 7 after first injection

Ttr transcript and serum TTR suppression: Lower hepatic Ttr FISH signal and serum TTR than SM-102; transcript/protein endpoints, not a measured genomic editing percentage.

Main Fig.6c-e, Results p.6, Methods p.11; SI Fig.46. Comparator: SM-102; PBS; Methods also describe a Cas9-only control.

Cropped from Zhang et al., Fig. 6d-f; hEPO in panel f belongs to the separate experiment below. CC BY 4.0.

Values shown are literature-reported results for the cited formulation and study conditions. They do not guarantee performance of the supplied product in other formulations or experiments.

Reference [1]: Zhang Z, Ren Y, Kong D, et al. Interpretable AI-guided discovery of degradable ionizable lipids with enhanced hepatic mRNA delivery in vivo. Nature Communications (2026), Article in Press. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78635-1. Exact source locations are given above.

Secreted hEPO expression

CargohEPO mRNA
RouteIntravenous, tail vein
Dose0.25 mg/kg mRNA
ModelC57BL/6 mice; n=3/group
Readout time24 h

Serum hEPO: Higher serum hEPO than SM-102 and PA86MD16; exact concentrations not transcribed from graph.

Main Fig.6f, Results p.6, Methods pp.10-11. Comparator: SM-102 and PA86MD16.

Values shown are literature-reported results for the cited formulation and study conditions. They do not guarantee performance of the supplied product in other formulations or experiments.

Reference [1]: Zhang Z, Ren Y, Kong D, et al. Interpretable AI-guided discovery of degradable ionizable lipids with enhanced hepatic mRNA delivery in vivo. Nature Communications (2026), Article in Press. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78635-1. Exact source locations are given above.

Mechanistic and tolerability observations

PA97MD101 and PA86MD16 showed reduced lysosomal colocalization in HeLa cells. Acidic-pH hemolysis and lipid-mixing assays support pH-dependent membrane activity. These observations are compatible with improved intracellular release; they do not demonstrate a specific hepatocyte receptor mechanism.

The study found no overt injury in examined acute histology and lower cytokine responses for PA97MD101 in the plotted comparisons. This does not establish chronic or clinical safety. The cytokine-specific dose and cargo are not fully resolved in the supplied methods.

Main Fig. 4 and Fig. 6g-m; Supplementary Figs. 23-25 and 48-49. Animal results generally n = 3 per group.

Values shown are literature-reported results for the cited formulation and study conditions. They do not guarantee performance of the supplied product in other formulations or experiments.

Reference [1]: Zhang Z, Ren Y, Kong D, et al. Interpretable AI-guided discovery of degradable ionizable lipids with enhanced hepatic mRNA delivery in vivo. Nature Communications (2026), Article in Press. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78635-1. Exact source locations are given above.

References for formulation & performance

  1. Zhang Z, Ren Y, Kong D, et al. Interpretable AI-guided discovery of degradable ionizable lipids with enhanced hepatic mRNA delivery in vivo. Nature Communications (2026), Article in Press. doi:10.1038/s41467-026-78635-1. Main Methods pp. 10–11; Fig. 5 (Fluc/Cre); Fig. 6 (Cas9/sgTtr, hEPO and acute observations). Supplementary Fig. 22, pp. 23–24 (identity); Fig. 25, p. 26 (pKa and encapsulation). Page numbers refer to the supplied article-in-press PDF and supplementary PDF. Supplementary information is accessible through the publisher article page.
  2. DC Chemicals. 1,2-DSPC (DC57005). Molecular weight 790.15 g/mol, rounded from the product specification.
  3. DC Chemicals. Cholesterol (DCD-041). Molecular weight 386.65 g/mol.
  4. DC Chemicals. DMG-PEG2000 (DC40169). Confirm the complete conjugate average molecular weight from the batch documentation; no fixed value is preselected in this calculator.

DC Chemicals component specifications checked 14 October 2026. The cited paper provides the formulation and performance evidence; product links identify corresponding catalog components.