DC ChemicalsChemicals for Life Science
sales@dcchemicals.com

DCL0006 · Updated 24 October 2026

BP-200-C12
Formulation & Performance

This edition organizes the previously reviewed, source-linked product record. It is not a new independent review of every paper or supporting file. Reported and calculated values retain their original labels.

Literature guide · DCL0006

Formulation & Performance

Study-specific compositions, preparation conditions and experimental outcomes for BP-200-C12.

Evidence coverage

Main paper and SI reviewed; free LNP, mineral-bound mRNA delivery and siRNA experiments are separated.

1. Formulations and component amounts

Reported composition and calculated mass are separate. Molecular-weight inputs use the current catalog values; DMG-PEG2000 is fixed initially at 2507. Edit inputs only when using a verified alternative material.

MiTEX

mol%Main Methods

ComponentMolecular weightReported molar entryCalculated mass
BP-200-C122374.635Not calculated
DOPE744.0316Not calculated
Cholesterol386.6546.5Not calculated
14:0 PEG2000 PENot confirmed2.5Not calculated

No complete mass recipe is generated for this formulation while composition or identity-dependent inputs remain unresolved.

How component weights are calculated

For total lipid mass M (mg), molar parts rᵢ and molecular weight MWᵢ: component mass = M × rᵢ × MWᵢ / Σ(r × MW). Component amount (µmol) = component mass (mg) × 1000 / MWᵢ. Molar parts are normalized only for the displayed percentage. The calculation does not infer N/P or RNA dose.

2. Preparation and experimental setup

ParameterReported procedure / limitationSource
LNP formationEthanolic lipid phase mixed with citrate-buffered aqueous RNA by vigorous pipetting; dialysis against 1× PBS for 2 h; 0.22 µm filtration.Methods; exact buffer pH, phase ratio and mixing rate not recovered
N/P / mass ratioN/P and a directly verified lipid:RNA mass ratio are not established here.No conversion from particle size or loading is attempted
Reported lipid batchBP-200-C12 2.20 × 10⁻⁷ mol; DOPE 1.01 × 10⁻⁷; cholesterol 2.92 × 10⁻⁷; PEG lipid 1.57 × 10⁻⁸.Main Methods; rounded values
HA-disc workflow10 × 2 mm HA discs; overnight preconditioning in DMEM + 0.2% collagen; incubate with 150 µL LNP containing 2,000 ng RNA at 37 °C with shaking for 24 h; wash; seed 50,000 BJ cells or 100,000 mMSCs.Methods; assay readout 48 h after seeding
Bone-graft experiment4 million tdROSA mMSCs, 40 mg HA/TCP and 20 µL LNP at 520 ng RNA/µL per implant; subcutaneous implantation in nude mice.Methods; RNA per implant = 10.4 µg, calculated

3. Particle characterization

Measurement / batchReported resultEvidence context
siMiTEX (siRNA formulation)154.3 nm; PDI 0.203; zeta potential −29.28 mVSI Fig. S13; not transferred to the mRNA-loaded batch
PEG-lipid identity14:0 PEG2000 PE is a phospholipid-linked PEG componentMethods; not DMG-PEG2000
Complete mass conversionWithheld until the exact PEG material molecular-weight basis is confirmedDOPE and cholesterol values alone do not define the full mass recipe

4. Performance by experiment

Experiment and doseReadout and comparatorResult and source
Free LNP at low RNA dose

mMSCs; Cre mRNA; 20 ng / 20,000 cells

Readout: SI assay endpoint

Comparator: C12-200 LNP

MiTEX 22.9% versus C12-200 57.5% reporter-positive cells: MiTEX is inferior in this free-particle condition.SI Fig. S4
Free LNP at higher dose

mMSCs; Cre mRNA; 200 ng / 20,000 cells

Readout: SI assay endpoint

Comparator: C12-200 LNP

71.2% versus 70.3%; no significant difference reported.SI Fig. S4
Mineral binding

HA binding assay; fluorescent-lipid tracking

Readout: 120 min

Comparator: C12-200 LNP

Approximately 80% versus 10% bound at 120 min. This kinetic assay is distinct from the 24 h disc-loading workflow.Fig. 2 / mineral-binding study
After-wash HA retention

HA discs; 2,000 ng mRNA input

Readout: After loading and washing

Comparator: C12-200 LNP

Approximately 200 ng retained with MiTEX versus <50 ng with control LNPs. Input dose and retained dose are different quantities.Fig. 3b
Mineral-mediated Cre delivery

mMSCs seeded on loaded HA discs; Cre reporter

Readout: 48 h after seeding

Comparator: C12-200 LNP on HA

Approximately 80% versus 17.92% reporter-positive cells. The advantage appears in the mineral-bound delivery context.Fig. 3e–f
STAT3 silencing

Gingival fibroblasts; STAT3 siRNA, 1–100 nM

Readout: 24 h

Comparator: Control formulation and untreated cells

>90% knockdown at 50 and 100 nM; both tested carrier systems exceed 90% at 50 nM. No superiority is inferred from this endpoint alone.siRNA results; SI characterization
Bone-graft reporter persistence

Subcutaneous HA/TCP/mMSC implant with Cre-mRNA LNP

Readout: Results describe 60 days; Methods describe 8 weeks

Comparator: Control-graft conditions

Reporter evidence is evaluated in an implanted scaffold/cell system, not as direct systemic bone targeting. The duration wording is retained as a source discrepancy.Bone-graft Results and Methods

Mechanistic evidence

The experiments support hydroxyapatite association and delivery from a mineral surface. They do not establish that all bisphosphonate LNPs outperform C12-200 in suspension.

5. Interpretation and unresolved details

  • Bisphosphonate-mediated mineral association is central to the reported benefit. Low-dose free LNP delivery is not universally improved.
  • Do not substitute DMG-PEG2000 for the reported 14:0 PEG2000 PE without making a new formulation.
  • The scaffold study describes 60 days in Results and 8 weeks in Methods; no exact equivalence is assumed.

Results apply to the stated LNP composition, cargo, process, dose, route and model. LNP experimental measurements are not batch-release specifications for the isolated lipid.

6. References and data access

Liu J, et al. Chemically Tailored Lipids Mediate Solid-phase RNA Programming of Mineralized Microenvironments. Biomaterials (2026), article 124680. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2026.124680

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2026.124680

Download experiment table (CSV) · Open printable Formulation & Performance guide

Revision FP-20261022 · Source review: 22 October 2026 · DC Chemicals